Saturday, May 2, 2009

sleepy treatise on nursing and working

Here she is at about eight weeks--photo taken about a week ago. We went for her two-month check-up yesterday and learned she's 12# 10 oz. in the nude. Way to go, Anna! Her onesie comes from Paul, who works here.

I've had the idea for this post in my head for days, but I'm too tired now to carry it out with as much thought as I had intended. Just read this blogger's post about the breastfeeding relationship and carrying it out over the long-er haul. I'm happy for her that she's going to a really cool writers' workshop, but sad that women who work "outside the home," to use that quaint turn of phrase, are constantly expected to put their children's needs behind those of their employers/vocations.

Yes, I know it is important to ply oneself to the task at hand, but I don't understand why working mothers, especially the mothers of children under a year, are not afforded more options in deciding how to mother and how to continue the breastfeeding relationship through at least the first year of the baby's life.

What might these options be? More U. S. employers, according to a recent NPR report, are making it possible for infants under six months to accompany their mothers to work. It is my humble opinion that, were the work world to take this idea seriously, interested nursing-working mothers from all sectors of the work world would do their best to make the arrangement worthwhile for employer and employee alike. I work as a chaplain in a long-term care setting and believe that, with the support of my mother (who is Anna's caregiver on the days I work), I could successfully have lovely Anna with me 40 to 80 per cent (or maybe more) of the time I'm on the job. Moreover, I think the women who work alongside me as nurse aides, nurses and med. aides could also, with a staffed baby room within a 30-second walk, have their babies (held safely in slings) close by much of the time they are working.

Another option, of course, would be that our nation could grant mothers / families twelve months of maternity or paternity leave when a baby is born. Right there we could do so much to ensure successful mother-baby breastfeeding relationships for at least the first year of life. And save ourselves some money in health care expenses, too, considering all that's been written about how breastfeeding ensures good health for the mother-child dyad.

For me, full-time ministry and full-time mothering don't mix. I feel too divided in my soul if I have to choose (in the middle of the night or on a birthday or too many week nights in a row) between my children and my career. I want my children to win, because I'm the only mother they have. Even working fewer hours than I did before Anna was born (about twelve now instead of about sixteen), those two days of working outside the home take me four days to catch up from.

When Henry was an infant I nursed him in the middle of the day and then pumped my milk in the morning and afternoon. I felt okay about this arrangement. It seemed like the best it could be given the circumstances. I was thankful to have a husband who was committed to getting our baby to me once a day. Now, thanks to my mother (who lives a short walk from my office) and my employer's willingness to let me be flexible with my schedule, I don't even have to pump. My nursing relationship with Anna can continue on work days and at-home days.

Here's the thing: like many women in the workforce, if I were to quit my very meaningful job right now (or if I were to be "terminated"), Joel and I would face great difficulty continuing to feed and house our family. The money I earn is not recreational or even savings money; it is essential to our family's well-being. True, we'd come up with some kind of alternative; we'd have to. But that alternative may well be my going back to full-time work in a lower paying job, taking both Joel and me away from home and our children nearly 100 per cent of the work week.

Oh, my earnest prayer is that all families would have the security they need to start their children off in the world. I wish all mothers who want to could breastfeed their infants 100 per cent of the time. If you're passionate about this topic, you might read this and listen to this. After listening to that last link, I felt exceptionally ambivalent about the National Organization for Women.

5 comments:

Beverly said...

I'll comment on my own post and say that we always have options. Yes, I do have the option of quitting work entirely. It would mean we would earn even less than our already-below-the-taxable-income level income and that we would be in great financial jeopardy, but I do have that option. I could find work to do from home. Telemarketing, perhaps. But I enjoy chaplaincy and have gifts to share in that field. Why do we frame so many situations in either-or terms, believing that that which has never been tried must never BE tried?

Beth said...

Amen. The struggle is so hard to balance work and family and other commitments, isn't it? Enjoying the work itself doesn't make it easier to be away and contemplate what would happen without the income. It's just hard.

Sher said...

I'm reading your post on Mom's Day and agree with EVERYTHING you're saying.

Ten years ago I was personally faced with this as well. Being a teacher and having a baby in the Spring is NO accident.

We nursed for 2 years and can't imagine doing it any other way.

I just ordered 2 of those onesies ... anyone interested has got to go to the site and read the back of the shirt. :)

Lisa Anne said...

This weekend at the mother/daughter sweat lodge there were prayers of this nature going round. I too wish our country would learn the importance of supporting nursing working mothers or even just mothers in general.

Your baby is so beautiful! Blessings on your journey together.

Jenn said...

I have to admit up front I am not nor have been a breastfeeding mother...but it is due to genetics versus lack of interest or trying. But the option of being able to have my girls at work with me while they were so young I would have done in a heartbeat(even though I'd be the one with a bottle and formula). I work out of necessity and even now I don't make enough to take care of us, but staying home with my precious girls just isn't an option for us.
Thank you for all your thoughts and links. And I hope one day soon we are more like Norway & Sweden and allow our mothers 12-18 months of leave after the child and the father several months also to help ease the transitions, keep the family close and just create a better environment for everyone.